I recently read a piece in my investigative reporting class
about the mistreatment of people with mental disabilities in group houses
surrounding Washington, D.C. during the late 90’s. The reporting included in
the story was amazing, and the narration through which then-Washington Post
reporter Katherine Boo told the stories of each abused person was pure genius.
I felt like I knew each person – each person had a voice. The language she
used clearly provoked a tremendous amount of emotion in the reader because the
piece won a Pulitzer Prize. There was one word in the story, though, that made
me hate the entire piece: retarded.
I understood what Boo was trying to convey through the use
of the word. She was trying to convey the language used by the men and women
leading these group homes where so many people suffered – and even died –
under their care. These group owners had no remorse for the people they
allegedly “cared” for. Simply put, the people were “retarded,” and the owners
didn’t deem them worth the value to watch after. But each paragraph that word
appeared, I cringed. What was the overall significance of it? There obviously
was one, otherwise the Pulitzer wouldn’t be plastered to the story. I counted,
and in day one of her multi-day serious, she used the r-word 46 times. That is
46 times more than necessary in my opinion, but who am I to decide the style of
the story? I’m just the reader.
I’m not sure what it is that makes me so prone to hating the
use of that word. Maybe it is my fraternity drilling it into me, which promotes
the end of the r-word. Maybe it is just the raw insignificance of the word.
Maybe it is the connotation behind it – that it was morphed over time to
portray a symbol of weakness or inferiority. To me, it is much like when I hear
someone use the n-word, or calling someone a fag or “so gay” to convey lack of
intelligence or importance.
I’m in no way a savior when it comes to using “politically
incorrect” language, as many have come to call it. I, too, have fallen victim
over time to using words that are so demeaning to a particular group of people as
the form of an adjective in a sentence. But it’s wrong, and I was wrong for
using them. I picture it this way: what if my name became a derogatory term to
describe something as utter worthlessness? How would I feel if someone hated
the idea of something so much, they said, “no man, that’s so matt?” It’s a
simple word that can hold that kind of personal meaning to someone, as personal
as one’s own name.
To one person, those words could hurt more than a fist blow
to the face. To one person, those words could leave a scar far deeper than any
wound.
-Matthew Kwiecinski
No comments:
Post a Comment